6023480/2024Struck out

Hazeldene Medical Center Ltd

v A Patel

23 April 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Taft

Respondent

Hazeldene Medical Center Ltd

All cases →

Decision date

23 April 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Taft

Case Summary

The claimant Arti Patel brought a claim against Hazeldene Medical Center Ltd. The respondent applied to strike out the claim. The tribunal dismissed the respondent's strike out application.

Related claim guides

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

Key Issues

  • Strike out application

Decision Text

Full PDF

Case Number: 6023480/24 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Arti Patel Respondent: Hazeldene Medical Center Ltd Heard at: Cambridge Employment Tribunal (By Video) On: 20 March 2026 Before: Employment Judge Taft REPRESENTATION: Claimant: Represented herself Respondent: Mr Azam (Litigation Executive) JUDGMENT 1. The respondent’s application to strike out the claim is dismissed. Approved by: Employment Judge Taft 30 March 2026 Judgment sent to the parties on: 23 April 2026 For the Tribunal: Notes Summary Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Those reasons may be summary reasons or full written Case Number: 6023480/24 2 reasons. If full written reasons are provided they will be placed online. All judgments (apart from judgments under Rule 51) and any full written reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimants and respondents. If a Tribunal hearing has been recorded, you may request a transcript of the recording. Unless there are exceptional circumstances, you will have to pay for it. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge. There is more information in the joint Presidential Practice Direction on the Recording and Transcription of Hearings and accompanying Guidance, which can be found at www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/employment-rules-and-legislation- practice-directions/

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.