Decision date
30 April 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Aspden
Compensation awarded
£146
Extracted from judgment text — may not capture every award component precisely.
Case Summary
The claimant brought claims for unfair dismissal and unauthorised wage deductions. The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed as not well founded. The tribunal found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction by failing to pay for one day's accrued untaken holiday on termination, ordering payment of £146.00. A further claimed deduction of £398.83 for February 2025 was dismissed as not well founded.
Why this outcome?
One claim dismissed on the meritsThe unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and dismissed. The tribunal found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction by failing to pay for accrued untaken holiday on termination (£146.00), but the claimed further deduction of £398.83 for February 2025 was not substantiated.
Claim Types
Related guide
Unfair dismissal cases won in the UK
Compare this judgment with other successful unfair dismissal cases and controlled win reasons.
Related claim guides
Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.
Key Issues
- •fairness of dismissal
- •unauthorised deduction from wages for accrued holiday
- •unauthorised deduction for February 2025
Decision Text
Case No. 6023162/2025 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: M Hall Respondent: Modern Architectural Stone Limited HELD AT: Newcastle by CVP ON: 29-30 April 2026 BEFORE: Employment Judge Aspden REPRESENTATION: Claimant: Respondent: In person Mr Roberts, counsel JUDGMENT The judgment of the Tribunal is: 1. The complaint of unfair dismissal is not well founded and is dismissed. 2. The respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages by failing to pay the claimant for one day’s accrued untaken holiday on termination on employment. The respondent must pay the claimant £146.00, which is the amount owing. 3. The complaint that the respondent made a further unauthorised deduction of £398.83 from the claimant’s wages for February 2025 is not well founded and is dismissed. Employment Judge Aspden Date____30 April 2026_______ Notes Summary reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. Written summary reasons will not be provided unless a party asked for them at the hearing or makes a written request which the Tribunal receives within 14 days of sending this written record of the decision.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Claimant
- M Hall
- Case No.
- 6023162/2025
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 30 April 2026
- Published
- 10 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden
- Representation
- Litigant in person