Chief Constable of Essex Police

Case Summary

The tribunal does not have jurisdiction to decide the allegations of direct sex discrimination or harassment, and the allegations of direct race discrimination or harassment, as they do not concern alleged detriments suffered in the employment field. Accordingly, these allegations are dismissed.

The tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear the discrimination and harassment allegations because they did not concern detriments suffered in the employment field, which is required for the tribunal's jurisdiction over such claims.

• •jurisdiction

1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr Eugene Robinson Respondent: Chief Constable of Essex Police Heard at: East London Hearing Centre (by CVP) On: 18 February 2026 Before: Employment Judge Gardiner Representation Claimant: Self-represented Respondent: Mr David Jones, counsel JUDGMENT ON JURISDICTION The judgment of the Tribunal is that:- 1. The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to decide the allegations of direct sex discrimination or harassment at allegation 3.2.1.5 and 6 and the allegations of direct race discrimination or harassment at allegations 3.2.2.10(a) and 3.2.2.10(b) and 6. They do not concern alleged detriments suffered in the employment field. 2. Accordingly, these allegations are dismissed. Employment Judge Gardiner Dated: 18 February 2026 Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to employment tribunal decisions All judgments and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment- tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case. 2