Pertemps Recruitment Partnership Ltd

Case Summary

The claim under s80H(1)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 regarding the rejection of the Claimant's flexible working request based on incorrect facts was dismissed.

The tribunal dismissed the claim under s80H(1)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 because the claimant's flexible working request rejection was not based on incorrect facts, or the claimant failed to establish that incorrect facts were the reason for rejection.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •s80H(1)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 that the Claimant’s flexible working request was rejected on the basis of incorrect facts

1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant:Mrs J Robinson Respondent:Pertemps Recruitment Partnership Limited Heard at:Southampton (by CVP) On:23 and24 October 2025 Before:Employment Judge Yallop REPRESENTATION: Claimant:In person Respondent: Mr A Fernandes (counsel) JUDGMENT The judgment of the Tribunal is as follows: 1.The complaint under s80H(1)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 that the Claimant’s flexible working request was rejected on the basis of incorrect facts is not well-founded and is dismissed. Employment Judge Yallop 24 October 2025 Judgment sent to the parties on: 24 th November 2025 .......................................... For the Tribunal: Simon Fraser .......................................... 2 Note Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. Written reasons will not be provided unless a party asked for them at the hearing or a party makes a written request within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments (apart from judgments under rule 51) and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case.