Decision date
28 May 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Shepherd
Case Summary
The claimant's claim was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claimant had been employed for less than two years and therefore lacked the qualifying period required to bring the claim. The claimant was given an opportunity to respond to a strike-out warning but failed to reply.
Why this outcome?
No qualifying employment periodThe claim was struck out because the claimant had been employed for less than two years, which means the tribunal could not consider the complaint as the claimant did not meet the statutory qualifying period requirement.
Claim Types
Related claim guides
Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.
Key Issues
- •Whether claimant had the requisite two-year qualifying period for unfair dismissal claim
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page. Tribunal Intel does not republish the raw judgment text inline.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Case No.
- 6014422/2026
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 28 May 2026
- Published
- 19 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd