Decision date
18 May 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Midgley
Case Summary
The respondent's response was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the respondent failed to comply with a Tribunal Order dated 9 April 2026 and had not actively pursued the response. The respondent will be entitled to notice of hearings and decisions but may only participate to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Why this outcome?
Non-compliance with ordersThe response was struck out because the respondent had not complied with the Tribunal's Order of 9 April 2026 and had not actively pursued the response, satisfying the grounds under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
Claim Types
Related calculator
Use the matching calculator page to compare this decision with published award patterns.
See unpaid wages compensation dataKey Issues
- •Non-compliance with tribunal order dated 9 April 2026
- •Response not actively pursued
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Case No.
- 6012215/2025
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 18 May 2026
- Published
- 2 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley