6012112/2024Struck out

Morgan Woods

11 February 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Quill

Respondent

Morgan Woods

All cases →

Decision date

11 February 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Quill

Case Summary

The claimant claimed a redundancy payment from Morgan Woods. The tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant had been employed for less than two years, which is the minimum qualifying period required by section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Why this outcome?

No qualifying employment period

The claim was struck out because the claimant was employed for less than two years, and section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 provides that employees do not have the right to a redundancy payment unless they have been employed for two years or more.

Claim Types

Related claim guides

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

Key Issues

  • Whether claimant has right to redundancy payment
  • Whether claimant meets two-year employment requirement under section 155 Employment Rights Act 1996

Original published judgment

The full source document is available from the official publication page.

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.