6011040/2024Struck out

Shine Care Ltd

v Mr K Tomlinson

3 January 2025·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Sweeney

Respondent

Shine Care Ltd

All cases →

Decision date

3 January 2025

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Sweeney

Case Summary

Employment Judge Sweeney struck out the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint due to insufficient service period and failure to provide acceptable reasons.

Why this outcome?

No qualifying employment period

The claimant did not meet the qualifying 2-year employment period required to bring an unfair dismissal claim.

Claim Types

Related claim guides

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

Key Issues

  • two years service required for unfair dismissal complaint

Decision Text

Full PDF

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr K Tomlinson Respondent: Shine Care Ltd JUDGMENT The complaint that the claimant was unfairly dismissed is struck out. REASONS 1. The claimant complains of unfair dismissal. 2. Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years service to make an unfair dismissal complaint. 3. The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years. 4. Therefore the claimant is not entitled to bring such a complaint. 5. The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out. 6. Accordingly, the complaint of unfair dismissal is struck out. The claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgment. Approved by Employment Judge Sweeney Date: 3 January 2025

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.