Uber

Case Summary

The Employment Judge dismissed the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal against Uber London Limited, stating that the tribunal does not have jurisdiction over this claim.

The tribunal does not have jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim against Uber London Limited.

• •jurisdiction of the tribunal to hear the claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal

1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr Z Hussein Respondent: Uber HELD AT: East London Hearing Centre (by CVP) ON: 4 February 2025 BEFORE: Employment Judge Martin REPRESENTATION: Claimant: In Person Respondents: Ms K Davis (Counsel) with instructing solicitor in attendance JUDGMENT 1. The correct name of the Respondent is Uber London Limited. 2. This Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to hear the claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal, which is hereby dismissed. REASONS Oral reasons were given at the hearing today. The parties are entitled to apply for written reasons within fourteen days of the date the Judgment is sent to them. Employment Judge Martin Dated: 5 February 2025 2 Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment- tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case.