6008525/2025Respondent won

TWS Contracts Ltd

v Miss J Curtis

14 April 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Harrison

Respondent

TWS Contracts Ltd

All cases →

Decision date

14 April 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Harrison

Case Summary

Miss J Curtis claimed unfair dismissal against TWS Contracts Ltd. The tribunal heard the case on 13-14 April 2026 before Employment Judge Harrison. The tribunal found the claimant's claim for unfair dismissal was not well founded, meaning the respondent did not unfairly dismiss the claimant.

Why this outcome?

Claim not well-founded

The tribunal found the claim for unfair dismissal was not well founded, meaning the respondent's dismissal of the claimant was fair. The oral reasons given at hearing constitute the full judgment.

Claim Types

Related claim guides

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

Key Issues

  • Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed

Decision Text

Full PDF

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss J Curtis Respondent: TWS Contracts Ltd Heard at: Reading Employment Tribunal On: 13 and 14 April 2026 (By CVP) Before: Employment Judge Harrison Representation: For the claimant: In person For the respondent: Miss A Doble, Counsel JUDGMENT 1. The claimant’s claim for unfair dismissal is not well founded. This means the respondent did not unfairly dismiss the claimant. Approved by Employment Judge Harrison 14 April 2026 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 14 May 2026 ...................................................................... ...................................................................... FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case. If there are written full reasons for the judgment, they are also published. Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. The reasons given orally were the full reasons, and therefore the written full reasons would be provided if there was such a request. Recording and Transcription Please note that if a Tribunal hearing has been recorded you may request a transcript of the recording, for which a charge may be payable. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge. There is more information in the joint Presidential Practice Direction on

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.