Arms Hospitality Ltd T/a Bridge Arms (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation)

Case Summary

Mr Cheekhoory claimed direct race discrimination, which was dismissed. The tribunal found the respondent liable for failing to pay accrued holiday (£1,232), making unauthorised wage deductions (£1,886.18), breaching contract by dismissing without notice (£560), and failing to provide a statement of terms (£2,334.08). Total award: £6,012.

The race discrimination claim was dismissed on its merits. The respondent was found liable for multiple breaches: unpaid accrued holiday entitlements, unauthorised wage deductions throughout employment, dismissal without proper notice in breach of contract, and failure to provide a written statement of terms.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •Direct race discrimination claim
• •Failure to pay accrued but untaken annual leave
• •Unauthorised deductions from wages
• •Breach of contract - dismissal without notice
• •Failure to provide statement of terms

Case No: 6007726/2024 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr R Cheekhoory Respondent: Arms Hospitality Ltd t/a Bridge Arms (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) Heard at: Croydon (via CVP) On: 24 and 25 March 2026 Before: Employment Judge Leith Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: No attendance or representation JUDGMENT 1. The compliant of direct race discrimination fails and is dismissed. 2. The Respondent failed to pay the Claimant for his accrued but untaken annual leave on termination of his employment. The Respondent must pay the Claimant the net sum of £1,232, being the value of the holiday accrued but untaken. 3. The Respondent made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant’s wages throughout his employment. The Respondent must pay the Claimant the net sum of £1,886.18, being the sum deducted. 4. The Respondent was in breach of contract by dismissing the Claimant without notice. The Respondent must pay the Claimant the net sum of £560 as damages for the breach of contract. 5. The Respondent failed to provide the Claimant with a statement of terms. The Respondent must pay the Claimant the sum of £2,334.08 in respect of the failure. Approved by: Employment Judge Leith Dated: 25 March 2026 Case No: 6007726/2024 Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment-tribuna…