Manchester City Council

Case Summary

The claim was dismissed as it was not presented within the applicable time limit, although it was reasonably practicable to do so.

The claim was dismissed because it was filed outside the applicable statutory time limit, and the claimant has not demonstrated that it was not reasonably practicable to present it within that time.

• •claim not presented within applicable time limit, but reasonably practicable to do so

Case No: 6007015/2024 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms Majeed Respondent: Manchester City Council Heard at: Manchester (Hybrid, claimant in person and respondent by video) On: 4 July 2025 Before: Employment Judge Childe REPRESENTATION: Claimant: In person Respondent: Mr Stenson (counsel) PRELIMINARY HEARING IN PUBLIC JUDGMENT The judgment of the Tribunal is as follows: 1. The claim was not presented within the applicable time limit. It was reasonably practicable to do so. The claim is therefore dismissed. Approved by: Employment Judge Childe 4 July 2025 Judgment sent to the parties on: 4 July 2025 .......................................... For the Tribunal: Note Case No: 6007015/2024 2 Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. Written reasons will not be provided unless a party asked for them at the hearing or a party makes a written request within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments (apart from judgments under rule 51) and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case.