Ares Renewables Ltd

Case Summary

The claimant's claim against Ares Renewables Limited was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The tribunal found that the claimant had failed to comply with a previous order dated 14th January 2025 and had not actively pursued the claim. After issuing a strike-out warning on 30th June 2025 and giving the claimant until 14th July 2025 to respond, the claimant failed to reply.

The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to comply with the Tribunal's Order dated 14th January 2025 and did not actively pursue the claim. The claimant's failure to respond to the strike-out warning letter of 30th June 2025 by the deadline of 14th July 2025 further demonstrated non-compliance and lack of pursuit.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •Non-compliance with Tribunal Order dated 14th January 2025
• •Claim not actively pursued

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant:Steven Pidgeon Respondent:Ares Renewables Limited JUDGMENT The Claim is struck out. REASONS 1.The Tribunal wrote to the Claimant on 30 th June 2025 warning him that the Tribunal was considering striking out the Claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that  The Claimant had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 14 th January 2025.  The Claim had not been actively pursued 2.The letter gave the Claimant an opportunity to explain why the Claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. He was required to reply by 14th July 2025. The Claimant has not replied. 3.I am satisfied that the grounds for striking out the claim under Rule 38 apply, and that it would be in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 3 to strike out the Claim. This is because the Claimant has not replied to the strike out warning dated 30th June 2025, which underlines his failure to comply with the Tribunal’s Orders and that the Claim is not being actively pursued. 4.The Claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Faulkner 12 th May 2026