Decision date
9 April 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Cookson
Case Summary
The claimant applied for interim relief in a whistleblowing claim against United Utilities Water Limited. The tribunal found it did not appear likely that the claimant was dismissed or, if dismissed, that the reason was a protected disclosure under section 103A ERA 1996. The application for interim relief was refused.
Why this outcome?
No reasonable prospectsThe tribunal found it did not appear likely that the claimant would succeed in establishing either that she was dismissed or that the reason for dismissal, if established, was a protected disclosure under section 103A ERA 1996.
Claim Types
Key Issues
- •interim relief application
- •whistleblowing dismissal under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996
- •likelihood of success on merits
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
Hearing venue
Decided at Manchester Employment Tribunal →- Case No.
- 6006003/2026
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 9 April 2026
- Published
- 15 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson
Registered Company
- Company name
- UNITED UTILITIES WATER LIMITED
- Company number
- 02366678
- Industry
- Utilities & Waste
- Status
- active