Highgate Care

Case Summary

The claimant's claim against Highgate Care was struck out following non-compliance with a tribunal order and failure to actively pursue the claim. The claimant did not respond to a warning letter dated 13 March 2026 giving an opportunity to explain or request a hearing.

The claim was struck out under Rule 38 because the claimant failed to comply with a tribunal order dated 12 March 2026 and did not actively pursue the claim. The claimant was given an opportunity to respond to a warning letter but failed to reply.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •non-compliance with tribunal order dated 12 March 2026
• •claim not actively pursued

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Helen Stromberg Respondent: Highgate Care JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 13 March 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim.  the claimant had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 12 March 2026  the claim had not been actively pursued 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied 3. I am satisfied that the grounds for striking out the claim under Rule 38 apply, and that it would be in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 3 to strike out the claim. 4. The claim is therefore struck out. Approved by: Employment Judge Lancaster 15 th May 2026