Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust

Case Summary

Dr Nashmil Mahmood applied for interim relief under sections 128-129 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 in relation to her claim for automatic unfair dismissal contrary to section 103A ERA. The tribunal heard the application on 2 April 2026 at East London Employment Tribunal. The application for interim relief was refused.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •Application for interim relief under sections 128-129 Employment Rights Act 1996 in relation to claim for automatic unfair dismissal contrary to section 103A ERA

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Dr Nashmil Mahmood Respondent: Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust Heard at: East London Employment Tribunal On: 2 April 2026 Before: Employment Judge C Lewis Representation Claimant: Mr Jack Mitchell -Counsel Respondent: Mr Ben Brown - Counsel JUDGMENT ON INTERIM RELIEF APPLICATION The Claimant’s application for interim relief under sections 128-129 Employment Rights Act 1996 (‘ERA’) in relation to her claim for automatic unfair dismissal contrary to section 103A ERA is refused. Approved by: Employment Judge C Lewis Dated: 2 April 2026 Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. If written reasons are provided they will be placed online. All judgments (apart from judgments under Rule 51) and any written reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimants and respondents. If a Tribunal hearing has been recorded, you may request a transcript of the recording. Unless there are exceptional circumstances, you will have to pay for it. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge. There is more information in the joint Presidential Practice Direction on the Recording and Transcription of Hearings and accompanying Guidance, which can be found here: www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/employment-rules-and-legislation-practice-directions/