Arcus FM Ltd

Case Summary

The claims for protected disclosure detriment, automatic unfair dismissal, and ordinary unfair dismissal were all dismissed.

The tribunal dismissed all claims (protected disclosure detriment, automatic unfair dismissal, and ordinary unfair dismissal) on their merits following a full hearing.

• •protected disclosure detriment under Section 47B Employment Rights Act 1996
• •automatic unfair dismissal under Section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996
• •ordinary unfair dismissal under Section 94 Employment Rights Act 1996

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr H Tebani Respondent: Arcus FM Limited Heard at: East London Hearing Centre On: 6, 7, 8, 9 May 2025 Before: Employment Judge Byrne Members: Ms J Clark Ms R Hewitt Representation Claimant: Represented himself Respondent: Mr Piers Chadwick, Consultant JUDGMENT 1. The claim for protected disclosure detriment under Section 47B Employment Rights Act 1996 is not upheld and is dismissed. 2. The claim for automatic unfair dismissal under Section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996 is not upheld and is dismissed. 3. The claim for ordinary unfair dismissal under Section 94 Employment Rights Act 1996 is not upheld and is dismissed. Employment Judge Byrne Dated: 9 May 2025 Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment- tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case.