Ferring Dental Clinic Ltd and others

Case Summary

The tribunal struck out the respondents' responses following their repeated failure to attend hearings, comply with tribunal orders, and actively pursue their defence. The case will proceed as a Rule 22 hearing where the claimant must prove the identity of the correct respondent and establish her claims.

The tribunal struck out the respondents' responses because they repeatedly failed to attend hearings, failed to comply with tribunal orders, and did not actively pursue their response, thereby wasting judicial resources and acting unreasonably.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •Non-compliance with tribunal orders
• •Failure to attend hearing
• •Response struck out under Rule 38

The full source document is available from the official publication page.