Aqualona Products Ltd

Case Summary

The claimant brought a claim for unfair dismissal. The tribunal found that the claimant was not an employee with 2 years continuous service. The claim was dismissed because the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to determine the claim.

The tribunal found that the claimant was not an employee with 2 years continuous service, which is a requirement for unfair dismissal claims. Therefore, the tribunal lacked jurisdiction to determine the claim.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •whether claimant was an employee
• •whether claimant had 2 years continuous service
• •jurisdiction to determine unfair dismissal claim

The full source document is available from the official publication page.