Aqualona Products Ltd

Case Summary

The claimant brought a claim for unfair dismissal. The tribunal found that the claimant was not an employee with 2 years continuous service. The claim was dismissed because the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to determine the claim.

The tribunal found that the claimant was not an employee with 2 years continuous service, which is a requirement for unfair dismissal claims. Therefore, the tribunal lacked jurisdiction to determine the claim.

• •whether claimant was an employee
• •whether claimant had 2 years continuous service
• •jurisdiction to determine unfair dismissal claim

Case No: 6002906/2025 10.1 Judgment – no hearing - rule 60 February 2018 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr. N Richmond Respondent: Aqualona Products Limited Heard at: Watford Employment Tribunal -heard remotely by CVP On: 20 February 2026 Before: Employment Judge Daley Representation Claimant: In person- Respondent: Mr. Rudd-Counsel JUDGMENT 1. Having heard from the claimant in person, and respondent’s representative Mr Rudd. 2. The Tribunal finds that claimant was not an employee with 2 years continuous service. 3. The claim of unfair dismissal is therefore dismissed because the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to determine Approved by: Employment Judge Daley Date 20.02.2026 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 13 March 2026 ...................................................................................... FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Note Written reasons will not be provided unless a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to employment tribunal decisions Case No: 6002906/2025 10.1 Judgment – no hearing - rule 60 February 2018 Judgments and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case.