Decision date
1 June 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Wright
Compensation awarded
£2,543
Extracted from judgment text — may not capture every award component precisely.
Case Summary
The claimant brought a claim for unlawful wage deductions. The respondent failed to present a response, resulting in Rule 22(3) applying. The tribunal found the claim well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay £43 net and £2,500 gross in respect of unauthorised wage deductions.
Why this outcome?
Default — respondent did not respondThe respondent failed to present a response to the claim, which resulted in Rule 22(3) applying. The claimant's claim for unauthorised wage deductions was found to be well-founded, with the respondent having made deductions of £43 net in September 2025 and £2,500 gross in October 2025 without authorisation.
Claim Types
Related calculator
Use the matching calculator page to compare this decision with published award patterns.
Estimate compensation for unpaid wages claimsKey Issues
- •unauthorised deductions from wages
- •failure to present response to claim
- •Rule 22(3) application
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
Hearing venue
Decided at London South Employment Tribunal →- Case No.
- 6001234/2026
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 1 June 2026
- Published
- 1 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright