The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

Case Summary

The claimant's claims of direct race discrimination and victimisation under the Equality Act 2010 were dismissed. The claimant's £50 deposit was refunded by consent.

The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims of direct race discrimination and victimisation under the Equality Act 2010.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •direct race discrimination
• •victimisation

Case No: 3324801/2019 10.2 Judgment - rule 61 February 2018 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr N Jones Respondent: The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care Heard at: Reading (via CVP) On: 14 th to 17 th December 2021 Before: Employment Judge Eeley Ms S Hughes Mr A Morgan Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: Ms M Tutin, counsel JUDGMENT 1. By consent, the respondent’s name is amended to the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. 2. The claimant’s claim of direct race discrimination contrary to sections 13 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010 fails and is dismissed. 3. The claimant’s claim of victimisation contrary to sections 27 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010 fails and is dismissed. 4. By consent it is ordered that the claimant’s deposit of £50 shall be refunded to him. The respondent consents to the refund being made without any admission that the deposit order was wrongly made and notwithstanding the Tribunal’s judgment dismissing the claimant’s Equality Act 2010 claims. Employment Judge Eeley Date: 20 th December 2021 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON: 22/1/2022 N Gotecha FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case No: 3324801/2019 10.2 Judgment - rule 61 February 2018 Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments and reasons for the judgme…