3313772/2023Struck out

London Borough of Haringey

v Ms K Sheriff

6 January 2025·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto

Respondent

London Borough of Haringey

All cases →

Decision date

6 January 2025

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto

Case Summary

The claim relating to Ms K Sheriff was struck out due to her failure to provide required details, attend a preliminary hearing, and be in contact with other parties. The claim form did not specify the grounds on which the claim was being made.

Why this outcome?

Non-compliance with orders

The claim was struck out because Ms K Sheriff failed to provide required details, did not attend a preliminary hearing, and failed to maintain contact with other parties, while the claim form itself did not specify the grounds of the claim.

Claim Types

Key Issues

  • The claimant has brought this claim as part of a multiple with . The two cases are based on different facts and do not give rise to any common questions of law. In the claim form the claimant has failed to set out the specific grounds on which the claim is being made.
  • The claimant was ordered by the Tribunal on 15 August 2024 to provide details of impact statement and medical evidence and has failed to do so.
  • The claimant did not attend the preliminary hearing for case management and has not been in contact with the other parties in the proceedings.
  • I am satisfied that the claimant is not interested in pursuing this case any further and it is not being actively pursued.

Decision Text

Full PDF

Case No:3313772/2023 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms K Sheriff Respondent: London Borough of Haringey JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The claimant has brought this claim as part of a multiple with . The two cases are based on different facts and do not give rise to any common questions of law. In the claim form the claimant has failed to set out the specific grounds on which the claim is being made. 2. The claimant was ordered by the Tribunal on 15 August 2024 to provide details of impact statement and medical evidence and has failed to do so. 3. The claimant did not attend the preliminary hearing for case management and has not been in contact with the other parties in the proceedings. 4. I am satisfied that the claimant is not interested in pursuing this case any further and it is not being actively pursued. 5. Pursuant to rule 38 (1) (d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024 the claim relating to Ms K Sheriff () is struck out. The claim relating to C Ioannou () continues. _____________________________ Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Date: 6 January 2025 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 29 January 2025................................ ........................................... FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.