3312057/2022Dismissed

London Borough of Haringey

v Mrs M Jeng- Kanu

17 June 2025·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Cowen

Respondent

London Borough of Haringey

All cases →

Decision date

17 June 2025

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Cowen

Case Summary

The claim of victimisation was dismissed.

Why this outcome?

Claim not well-founded

The tribunal dismissed the victimisation claim, indicating the claim was not well-founded on its merits following consideration of the evidence and legal principles.

Claim Types

Key Issues

  • reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing

Decision Text

Full PDF

Case No:3312057 /2022 6.2 Strike out Judgment – claim - rule 37 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mrs M Jeng- Kanu Respondent: London Borough of Haringey Heard at: Watford Tribunal On:9,10,11,12,13,16,17June 2025 Before: Employment Judge Cowen Mrs G Bhatt Mr I Murphy Representation Claimant: Mr Egan (counsel) Respondent: Mr O’Keeffe (counsel) JUDGMENT For the reasons given in an oral judgment at the hearing; 1. The claim of victimisation is dismissed. Approved by: Employment Judge Cowen On 17 June 2025 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON3 23 July 2025 . FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the Case No:3312057 /2022 6.2 Strike out Judgment – claim - rule 37 sending of this written record of the decision. If written reasons are provided they will be placed online. All judgments (apart from judgments under Rule 51) and any written reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at https://www.gov.uk/employment- tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimants and respondents. If a Tribunal hearing has been recorded, you may request a transcript of the recording. Unless there are exceptional circumstances, you will have to pay for it. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge. There is more information in the joint Presidential Practice Direction on the Recording and Transcription of Hearings and accompanying Guidance, which can be found here: www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/employment-rules-and-legislation- practice-directions/

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.