Dial Green Estates Management Ltd

Case Summary

Ms Alison Burke brought claims for unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, unlawful deductions of wages, and holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998 against Dial Green Estates Management Limited. All claims were dismissed as they were not presented within the applicable time limit, and it was reasonably practicable to do so. The respondent's application for costs failed.

All claims were dismissed because they were not presented within the applicable time limit and it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have done so.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •Whether claims were presented within applicable time limit
• •Whether it was reasonably practicable to present claims within time limit

Case No: 3311751/2024 10.7 Judgment with reasons – rule 62 March 2017 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms Alison Burke Respondent: Dial Green Estates Management Limited Heard at: Watford Employment Tribunal On: 2 April 2026 Before: Employment Judge Young Representation Claimant: Mr James Khalid (Counsel) Respondent: Mr Alex Lawson (Counsel) JUDGMENT 1. The claim of unfair dismissal was not presented within the applicable time limit. It was reasonably practicable to do so. The claim of unfair dismissal is therefore dismissed. 2. The claim of wrongful dismissal was not presented within the applicable time limit. It was reasonably practicable to do so. The claim of wrongful dismissal is therefore dismissed. 3. The claim for unlawful deductions of wages was not presented within the applicable time limit. It was reasonably practicable to do so. The claim for unlawful deductions of wages is therefore dismissed. 4. The claim for holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998 was not presented within the applicable time limit. It was reasonably practicable to do so. The claim for holiday pay is therefore dismissed. 5. The Respondent’s application for costs fails. Approved by: Employment Judge Young Dated 2 April 2026 JUDGMENT & REASONS SENT TO THE PARTIES ON Case No: 3311751/2024 10.7 Judgment with reasons – rule 62 March 2017 .......8 May 2026.............................................................. ........................................................................................ FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the d…