3311373/2023Respondent won

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Others

v L Phillips

30 January 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge S. Matthews

Respondent

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Others

All cases →

Decision date

30 January 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge S. Matthews

Case Summary

Claimant brought claims of disability discrimination, harassment, failure to make reasonable adjustments, discrimination arising from disability, and victimisation against the respondent. The claims were dismissed.

Why this outcome?

Claim not well-founded

The tribunal found that the claimant's complaints were not well-founded and dismissed all of the claims.

Related claim guides

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

Key Issues

  • direct disability discrimination
  • harassment related to disability
  • failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability
  • unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability
  • victimisation

Decision Text

Full PDF

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Lauren Phillips Respondent: 1. Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 2. Chloe Davies 3. Lynsey Claire Searle Heard at: Watford by CVP On: 31 October, 3, 4, 5, 6 November 2025 7 November 2025 (chambers) 22 January 2026 Before: Employment Judge S. Matthews Ms L. Davies Mrs. W. Smith Representation Claimant: Mr. M. Harris Respondent: Mr. B. Jones JUDGMENT The unaminous judgment of the tribunal is: 1. The complaint of direct disability discrimination is not well-founded and is dismissed. 2. The complaint of harassment related to disability is not well-founded and is dismissed. 3. The complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability is not well-founded and is dismissed. 4. The complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability is not well-founded and is dismissed. 5. The complaint of victimisation is not well-founded and is dismissed. Approved by: Employment Judge S. Matthews Date: 30 January 2026 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 16 March 2026....................................... ............................................................ FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.