3309103/2024Claimant won

Premiere Eurocom Ltd – In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation

v Ms C Cizmas

26 March 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge French

Respondent

Premiere Eurocom Ltd – In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation

All cases →

Decision date

26 March 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge French

Case Summary

The claimant claimed unfair dismissal and pregnancy discrimination against the respondent company. The tribunal found both complaints well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay a basic award of £2,164, compensatory award of £10,791 (with a 10% uplift for ACAS Code breach), and £11,700 for injury to feelings, totalling £24,655.

Why this outcome?

The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim well-founded and the pregnancy discrimination complaint also well-founded. The respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice, justifying a 10% uplift to the compensatory award.

Related guide

Unfair dismissal cases won in the UK

Compare this judgment with other successful unfair dismissal cases and controlled win reasons.

Open examples

Related claim guides

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

Key Issues

  • Unfair dismissal
  • Pregnancy discrimination
  • ACAS Code of Practice compliance

Decision Text

Full PDF

1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent v Ms C Cizmas Premiere Eurocom Limited – In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation Heard at: Watford On: 26 March 2026 Before: Employment Judge French Appearances For the Claimant: Mr E Mihai, claimant’s husband and assisted by Romanian Interpreter Ms M Eames-Boros For the Respondent: No appearance JUDGMENT 1. The complaint of unfair dismissal is well-founded. The claimant was unfairly dismissed. 2. The respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015 and it is just and equitable to increase the compensatory award payable to the claimant by 10 % in accordance with s 207A Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. 3. The respondent shall pay the claimant the following sums: A basic award of £2164.20. A compensatory award of £10,790.50 4. The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 do not apply. 5. The complaint of pregnanacy discrimination is well-founded and is upheld. 6. The respondent must pay the claimant the sum of £11,700 for injury to feelings. 7. The total amount owed to the claimant by the respondent is £24654.70. Approved by: Employment Judge French 26 March 2026 2 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 8 MAY 2026 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE . Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Recording and Transcription Please note that if a Tribunal hearing has been recorded you may request

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.