3307762/2024Claimant won

Signorellis Deli Ltd

v A Kazmiruk and M Dolzhykov

9 January 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales

Respondent

Signorellis Deli Ltd

All cases →

Decision date

9 January 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Decision Text

Full PDF

Case Numbers: 3307762/24; 3307763/24 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimants: Alisa Kazmiruk Mykyta Dolzhykov Respondent: Signorellis Deli Ltd Heard at: Bury St Edmunds Employment Tribunal (By video) On: 9 January 2026 Before: Employment Judge Taft REPRESENTATION: Claimants: Both represented by Mrs Kazmiruk Respondent: Did not attend JUDGMENT 1. The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is well-founded. The respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimants’ wages in the period from 26 March 2024 to 29 April 2024. 2. The respondent shall pay the first claimant (Alisa Kazmiruk) £1,487.93, which is the gross sum deducted. The claimant is responsible for the payment of any tax or National Insurance. 3. The respondent shall pay the second claimant (Mykyta Dolzhykov) £1,679.93, which is the gross sum deducted. The claimant is responsible for the payment of any tax or National Insurance. 4. The complaint in respect of holiday pay is well-founded. The respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimants’ wages by failing to pay the claimant for holidays accrued but not taken on the date the claimants’ employment ended. 5. The respondent shall pay the first claimant (Alisa Kazmiruk) £395.01. The claimant is responsible for paying any tax or National Insurance. Case Numbers: 3307762/24; 3307763/24 2 6. The respondent shall pay the second claimant (Mykyta Dolzhykov) £492.58. The claimant is responsible for paying any tax or National Insurance. 7. The complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay is well-founded. 8. The respondent shall pay the first claimant (Alisa Kazmiruk) £250.00 as damages for breach of contract. This figure has been calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the claimant will have to pay tax on it as Post Employment Notice Pay. 9. The respondent shall pay the second claimant (Mykyta Dolzhykov) £340.00 as damages fo

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.