L Hastings and P Hastings

Case Summary

The claim was struck out as the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing within the given timeframe and did not comply with the Tribunal's order.

The claimant failed to comply with the Tribunal's order by not making representations or requesting a hearing within the required timeframe.

• •the claimant had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 20th February 2025
• •it has not been actively pursued

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr D Chamberlain Respondent: 1. Luke Hastings, 2. Paul Hastings JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. By a letter dated 15 May 2025 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because  the claimant had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 20 th February 2025.  it has not been actively pursued. 2. The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out. Approved by: Employment Judge Alliott Date: 2 October 2025 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 22 October 2025 ..................................................................... FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE