New Clean Ltd and Mr A Trim

Case Summary

Mrs Raczek claimed unfair dismissal against New Clean Ltd and Mr Alan Trim. The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim succeeded. Claims under s.99 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and s.18 of the Equality Act were dismissed as not well founded.

The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed by the First Respondent, though the specific reasoning is not detailed in this summary judgment. The alternative claims under s.99 ERA 1996 and s.18 Equality Act were rejected as not well founded.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •unfair dismissal
• •s.99 Employment Rights Act 1996
• •s.18 Equality Act

1 of 2 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mrs Raczek Respondents: (1) New Clean Ltd (2) Mr Alan Trim Heard at: Cambridge Employment Tribunal On: 9 &10 April 2026 Before: Employment Judge Michell (sitting alone) Appearances: For the claimant: In person For the respondents: Mr Trim (director of the First Respondent) JUDGMENT The claim of unfair dismissal against the First Respondent succeeds. The claimant was unfairly dismissed. The claims brought under s.99 of the Employment Right Act 1996 and s.18 of the Equality Act are not well founded, and are dismissed. APPROVED BY Employment Judge Michell 10 April 2026 Sent to the parties on: ...21 April 2026............. For the Tribunal: .................................. 2 of 2 Summary reasons were given at the hearing. Written summary reasons will not be given unless a written request for them is received by the Tribunal within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision,