Decision date
23 January 2025
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Din
Case Summary
The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is not well-founded and the Claimant’s claim is dismissed.
Why this outcome?
Claim not well-foundedThe tribunal found that the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages lacked merit after considering the evidence presented at the full hearing.
Claim Types
Key Issues
- •unauthorised deductions from wages
Decision Text
Case No: 3303369 / 2024 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: A DIAS Respondent: LONDON BOROUGH OF HARINGEY Heard at: Watford Employment Tribunal (by video) On: 22 and 23 January 2025 Before: Employment Judge Din (sitting alone) Representation Claimant: T Jones, instructed by Tom Street Law Respondent: D Jones, instructed by Anthony Collins JUDGMENT The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is not well-founded and the Claimant’s claim is dismissed. Approved by: Employment Judge Din Date: 23 January 2025 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 31 January 2025...................................................... ...................................................................................... FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment- tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case. Case No: 3303369 / 2024 Recording and Transcription Please note that if a Tribunal hearing has been recorded you may request a transcript of the recording, for which a charge may be payable. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge. There is more information in the joint Presidential Practice Direction on the Recording and Transcription of Hearings, and accompanying Guidance, which can be f…
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Claimant
- A Dias
- Case No.
- 3303369/2024
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 23 January 2025
- Published
- 4 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Din
- Industry
- Public Sector / Government
- Representation
- Legally represented