Decision date
2 June 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst
Case Summary
The claimant, a Muslim Security Officer of Palestinian affiliation, brought claims of direct discrimination, harassment, and victimisation arising from her employment at LHR Airports Ltd following an incident involving her Palestinian flag badge in November 2023. The tribunal found all claims not well-founded, concluding that the claimant's deep Palestinian affiliation coloured her interpretation of events and that she was not a reliable recaller of facts.
Why this outcome?
Claim not well-foundedThe tribunal found the claimant's claims not well-founded because it determined that the claimant's strong Palestinian affiliation colours her interpretation of events and that she is not a reliable or credible recaller of facts. The tribunal found that the respondent's actions were motivated by legitimate operational and procedural reasons rather than by the claimant's race, religion, or Palestinian affiliation.
Related claim guides
Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.
Key Issues
- •Direct discrimination on grounds of race and religion
- •Harassment related to race and religion
- •Victimisation following protected acts
- •Credibility and reliability of claimant's account
- •Whether treatment was motivated by claimant's race, religion, or Palestinian affiliation
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Case No.
- 3300526/2024
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 2 June 2026
- Published
- 26 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst
- Industry
- airport security services
- Representation
- Litigant in person