Decision date
5 July 2024
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Shore
Claim Types
Key Issues
- •Direct Discrimination because of the protected characteristic of sex
Decision Text
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: KJ Respondent: British Council NOTICE OF CORRECTION Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Under the provisions of Rule 69, the Judgment and Reasons dated 8 March 2024, is corrected as set out in block, underlined type at: 1. Paragraphs (3) and (9) of the Judgment in respect of the Tribunal’s findings on Polkey and Chagger. 2. Paragraphs 171, 172, 208, and 209 of the Reasons in respect of the Tribunal’s findings on Polkey and Chagger. 3. Paragraphs 40.17.12, 40.17.13, 40.17.21, 40.17.22, 40.17.23, 40.17.48, 40.69, 40.73, 40.79, 40.83.4, 40.86, 40.88, 40.90, 40.114.1, 40.114.2, 40.114.3, 40.114.4, 40.114.5, 40.114.6, 40.114.7, 40.114.8, 40.114.9, 40.114.10, 40.114.11, 40.114.12, 40.114.14, 40.114.15, 40.115, 40.115.1, 40.115.2, 40.115.5, 40.115.6, 40.115.7, 40.115.8, 40.115.9, 119.3.3, 126.4, and 127 in respect of information that could lead to the identification of the claimant. 4. Paragraph (4) of the Judgment in respect of the Tribunal’s findings on direct discrimination because of the protected characteristic of sex. 5. Paragraph (4) 182 of the Reasons in respect of the Tribunal’s findings on direct discrimination because of the protected characteristic of sex. We have also amended obvious typographic errors. Employment Judge Shore Dated: 5 July 2024
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Claimant
- KJ
- Case No.
- 3200569/2022
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 5 July 2024
- Published
- 24 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Shore