3200128/2025Respondent won

Sohal Healthcare Ltd

v N White

14 April 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Gerri Elliott

Respondent

Sohal Healthcare Ltd

All cases →

Decision date

14 April 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Gerri Elliott

Case Summary

Nicola White brought claims of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal against Sohal Healthcare Limited. The tribunal found that both claims were not presented within the applicable time limits and that it was reasonably practicable to do so. Accordingly, both claims were dismissed in their entirety.

Why this outcome?

Out of time

The claims were dismissed because they were not presented within the applicable time limits and the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have presented them in time.

Key Issues

  • Time limit for presenting claims of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal
  • Whether it was reasonably practicable to present claims within applicable time limits

Related Cases

Decision Text

Full PDF

Case Numbers: 3200128/2025 & 6001422/2025 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Nicola White Respondent: Sohal Healthcare Limited Heard at: London East Employment Tribunal (in public; by CVP) On: 14 April 2026 Before: Employment Judge Elliott Representation: For the claimant: in person For the respondent: Ben Amunwa, counsel Observers: Junaid Sharif, Audrey Oknokwo PUBLIC PRELIMINARY HEARING JUDGMENT 1. The correct name of the respondent in case number 6001422/2025 is Sohal Healthcare Limited. Case number 3200128/25 and 6001422/25 are ordered to be considered together. 2. The claimant’s complaints of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal were not presented within the applicable time limits. It was reasonably practicable to do so. 3. Both of the claimant’s claims are therefore dismissed in their entirety. Case Numbers: 3200128/2025 & 6001422/2025 2 Approved by: Employment Judge Gerri Elliott Dated: 14 April 2026 Notes Summary reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written summary reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. All judgments (apart from judgments under Rule 51) and any full written reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimants and respondents. If a Tribunal hearing has been recorded, you may request a transcript of the recording. Unless there are exceptional circumstances, you will have to pay for it. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge. There is more information in the joint Pre

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.