Novocastrian

Case Summary

The claimant claimed a redundancy payment. The tribunal found that the claimant had been employed for less than two years, which is below the two-year minimum requirement under section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claim was struck out as the claimant had no legal right to a redundancy payment.

The claim was struck out because the claimant had been employed for less than two years, and section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires employees to have been employed for two years or more to have the right to a redundancy payment.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •Whether claimant has right to redundancy payment
• •Whether claimant had two years' qualifying employment

The full source document is available from the official publication page. Tribunal Intel does not republish the raw judgment text inline.