2403663/2024Respondent won

East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust and Ms Ramsdale

v Miss A Mulla

27 March 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Cookson

Respondent

East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust and Ms Ramsdale

All cases →

Decision date

27 March 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Cookson

Case Summary

Miss A Mulla brought claims of direct race discrimination, harassment related to race, and victimisation against East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust and Ms Ramsdale. The tribunal heard evidence over five days in March 2026. All complaints were found not to be well-founded and dismissed.

Why this outcome?

Claim not well-founded

The tribunal found that the claimant's complaints of direct race discrimination, harassment related to race, and victimisation were not well-founded.

Related claim guides

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

Key Issues

  • direct race discrimination
  • harassment related to race
  • victimisation

Decision Text

Full PDF

1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss A Mulla First Respondent: Second Respondent: East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust Ms Ramsdale Heard at: Manchester On: 23, 24,25, 26 and 27 March 2026 Before: Employment Judge Cookson REPRESENTATION: Claimant: Ms S Crawshay-Williams Counsel) First Respondent: Mr R Dunn (Counsel) Second Respondent: Mr R Ryan (Counsel) JUDGMENT (1) The complaints of direct race discrimination are not well-founded and are dismissed. (2) The complaints of harassment related to race are not well-founded and are dismissed. (3) The complaints of victimisation are not well-founded and are dismissed. Approved by: Employment Judge Cookson 27 March 2026 2 Judgment sent to the parties on: 29 April 2026 .......................................... For the Tribunal: .......................................... Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. If written reasons are provided they will be placed online. All judgments (apart from judgments under Rule 51) and any written reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimants and respondents. If a Tribunal hearing has been recorded, you may request a transcript of the recording. Unless there are exceptional circumstances, you will have to pay for it. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge. There is more information in the joint Presidential Practice Direction on the Recording and Transcription of Hearings and accompanying Gu

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.