2403205/2024Respondent Successful

Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust

v Mr H Chan

6 February 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge M Butler

Respondent

Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust

All cases →

Decision date

6 February 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge M Butler

Case Summary

Mr H Chan brought claims of harassment relating to race and direct race discrimination against Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust. The claimant withdrew certain allegations and the tribunal found that the remaining allegations of harassment relating to race and direct race discrimination failed. All claims were dismissed.

Why this outcome?

Claim not well-founded

The claimant's remaining allegations of harassment relating to race and direct race discrimination were not established and therefore failed on their merits.

Key Issues

  • allegations of harassment relating to race
  • allegations of direct race discrimination

Cited Laws

Equality Act 2010 race discriminationEquality Act 2010

Mr H Chan brought claims of harassment relating to race and direct race discrimination against Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust.

Decision Text

Full PDF

Case No: 2403205/2024 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr H Chan Respondent: Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust Heard at: Manchester Employment Tribunal On: 3, 4, 5 and 6 February 2026 Before: Employment Judge M Butler Representation Claimant: Self-representing Respondent: Mr J Boyd (of Counsel) JUDGMENT 1. The claimant withdrew allegations 1(2), 1(3) and 6(2) (numbering from the list of issues). These are dismissed on withdrawal. 2. The claimant’s remaining allegations of harassment relating to race fail and are dismissed. 3. The claimant’s remaining allegations of direct race discrimination fail and are dismissed. 4. For the avoidance of doubt, all claims in this case are dismissed. Approved by: Employment Judge M Butler Date_06 February 2026____ JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 24 March 2026 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case No: 2403205/2024 Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case. Recording and Transcription Please note that if a Tribunal hearing has been recorded you may request a transcript of the recording, for which a charge may be payable. If a transcript is produced it will not

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.