Rosehill Day Nursery Ltd

1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss N Murray Respondent: Rosehill Day Nursery Limited Heard at: Manchester (by CVP) On: 26-30 January 2026 Before: Employment Judge McDonald Mr G Pennie Ms S Moores REPRESENTATION: Claimant: Ms A Kaura (Counsel) Respondent: Miss S English (Litigation Consultant) JUDGMENT The unanimous judgment of the Tribunal is that: 1. The complaint of automatically unfair dismissal by reason of raising health and safety concerns (s.100(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996) is not well- founded. The claimant was not unfairly dismissed. 2. The complaint of automatically unfair dismissal by reason of whistleblowing (s.103A ERA) is not well-founded. The claimant was not unfairly dismissed. 3. The complaint of being subjected to detriment for raising health and safety concerns (s.44(1)(c) ERA) is not well-founded and is dismissed. 2 4. The complaint of being subjected to detriment for making a protected disclosure (s.47B(1) ERA) is not well-founded and is dismissed. 5. The complaints of direct disability discrimination (s.13 Equality Act 2010) are not well-founded and are dismissed. 6. The complaints of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability (S.15 Equality Act 2010) are not well-founded and are dismissed. 7. The complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability (ss.20- 21 Equality Act 2010) by refusing to stay the appeal proceedings pending written representations is well-founded and succeeds: 8. The remaining complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability is not well-founded and is dismissed. Approved by: Employment Judge Mcdonald 30 January 2026 Judgment sent to the parties on: 24 March 2026 For the Tribunal: ....................................... Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request...