2305919/2023Struck out

Royal Mail Group Ltd

v Mr C Amos

11 February 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Regional Employment Judge Khalil

Respondent

Royal Mail Group Ltd

All cases →

Decision date

11 February 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Regional Employment Judge Khalil

Case Summary

The claimant's claim against Royal Mail Group Limited was struck out following non-compliance with a tribunal order dated 31 July 2025 and failure to actively pursue the claim. The claimant failed to make sufficient representations in response to a January 2026 letter inviting them to show cause why the claim should not be struck out.

Why this outcome?

Non-compliance with orders

The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to comply with the tribunal's order dated 31 July 2025 and the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant also failed to make sufficient representations in response to the tribunal's opportunity to do so, making it impossible to have a fair trial on the scheduled dates.

Related claim guides

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

Key Issues

  • non-compliance with tribunal order dated 31 July 2025
  • failure to actively pursue the claim

Decision Text

Full PDF

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr Christopher Amos Respondent: Royal Mail Group Limited JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. By a letter dated 13 January 2026 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because:-  the claimant had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 31 July 2025 and  it has not been actively pursued. 2. This followed the respondent’s application dated 19 December 2025. 3. The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. 4. The claim is therefore struck out as it is considered that it is not possible to thus have a fair trial on the dates when the case has been listed to be heard and it is proportionate in the overriding objective to do so. 5. The Hearing fixed for 16-19 February 2026 has been vacated and will not take place. Approved by: Regional Employment Judge Khalil Date: 11 February 2026

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.