All Faiths Children Academy and Thinking Schools Academy Trust
v M Scott
Decision date
11 April 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Andrews
Case Summary
The claimant's claim against All Faiths Children Academy and Thinking Schools Academy Trust was struck out by the Tribunal. The Tribunal had written to the claimant on 18 February 2026 warning that it was considering striking out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not respond to the warning or request a hearing, resulting in the claim being struck out.
Why this outcome?
Not actively pursuedThe claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant failed to respond to the Tribunal's warning letter of 18 February 2026 or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out.
Key Issues
- •Whether the claim should be struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for lack of active pursuit
Decision Text
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Marie Scott Respondent: 1. All Faiths Children Academy 2. Thinking Schools Academy Trust JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 18 February 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that • the claim had not been actively pursued; 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Andrews 11 April 2026
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Claimant
- M Scott
- Case No.
- 2305516/2020
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 11 April 2026
- Published
- 13 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews