2305516/2020Struck out

All Faiths Children Academy and Thinking Schools Academy Trust

v M Scott

11 April 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Andrews

Respondent

All Faiths Children Academy and Thinking Schools Academy Trust

All cases →

Decision date

11 April 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Andrews

Case Summary

The claimant's claim against All Faiths Children Academy and Thinking Schools Academy Trust was struck out by the Tribunal. The Tribunal had written to the claimant on 18 February 2026 warning that it was considering striking out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not respond to the warning or request a hearing, resulting in the claim being struck out.

Why this outcome?

Not actively pursued

The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant failed to respond to the Tribunal's warning letter of 18 February 2026 or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out.

Key Issues

  • Whether the claim should be struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for lack of active pursuit

Decision Text

Full PDF

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Marie Scott Respondent: 1. All Faiths Children Academy 2. Thinking Schools Academy Trust JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 18 February 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that • the claim had not been actively pursued; 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Andrews 11 April 2026

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.