Oasis Community Learning and Oasis Academy Skinner Street

Case Summary

The claimant's employment tribunal claim against Oasis Community Learning and Oasis Academy Skinner Street was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The tribunal issued a warning letter on 10 January 2026 indicating it was considering striking out the claim because it had not been actively pursued, and gave the claimant an opportunity to respond. The claimant did not reply, and the claim was therefore struck out.

The claim was struck out because the claimant had not actively pursued the claim and failed to respond to the tribunal's warning letter dated 10 January 2026 giving an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing.

• •Whether claim should be struck out for lack of active pursuit

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Lisa Stanley Respondent: 1. Oasis Community Learning 2. Oasis Academy Skinner Street JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 10 January 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that • the claim had not been actively pursued; 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Andrews 11 April 2026