Oasis Community Learning and Oasis Academy Skinner Street

Case Summary

Jennifer Seymour's claim against Oasis Community Learning and Oasis Academy Skinner Street was struck out by the tribunal for failure to actively pursue the claim. The tribunal issued a warning letter on 10 January 2026 giving the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or request a hearing, but the claimant did not respond.

The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The tribunal issued a warning letter under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 giving the claimant an opportunity to respond or request a hearing, but the claimant failed to reply.

• •Whether claim should be struck out under Rule 38 of Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for lack of active pursuit

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Jennifer Seymour Respondent: 1. Oasis Community Learning 2. Oasis Academy Skinner Street JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 10 January 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that • the claim had not been actively pursued; 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Andrews 11 April 2026