2304172/2020Struck out

Kent County Council

20 April 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Andrews

Respondent

Kent County Council

All cases →

Decision date

20 April 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Andrews

Case Summary

The claimant's claim against Kent County Council was struck out. The tribunal issued a warning letter on 31 January 2026 indicating it was considering striking out the claim under Rule 38 on the grounds that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to respond to the warning letter or request a hearing, and the claim was therefore struck out.

Why this outcome?

Not actively pursued

The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant failed to respond to the tribunal's warning letter dated 31 January 2026 or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out.

Claim Types

Part-time-workersUnlawful DeductionWorking Time

Related calculator

Use the matching calculator page to compare this decision with published award patterns.

See unpaid wages compensation data

Key Issues

  • Whether claim should be struck out for failure to actively pursue under Rule 38 of Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024

Original published judgment

The full source document is available from the official publication page.

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.