Decision date
20 April 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Andrews
Case Summary
The claimant's claim against Kent County Council was struck out. The tribunal issued a warning letter on 31 January 2026 indicating it was considering striking out the claim under Rule 38 on the grounds that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to respond to the warning letter or request a hearing, and the claim was therefore struck out.
Why this outcome?
Not actively pursuedThe claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant failed to respond to the tribunal's warning letter dated 31 January 2026 or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out.
Claim Types
Related calculator
Use the matching calculator page to compare this decision with published award patterns.
See unpaid wages compensation dataKey Issues
- •Whether claim should be struck out for failure to actively pursue under Rule 38 of Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Case No.
- 2304172/2020
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 20 April 2026
- Published
- 18 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews