2303694/2020Struck out

The Abbey School (Faversham)

v M Walpole

21 April 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Andrews

Respondent

The Abbey School (Faversham)

All cases →

Decision date

21 April 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Andrews

Case Summary

The claimant's claim against The Abbey School (Faversham) was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The Tribunal had written to the claimant on 28 January 2026 warning of potential strike-out due to lack of active pursuit, but the claimant failed to respond.

Why this outcome?

Not actively pursued

The claim was struck out because the claimant had not actively pursued the claim and failed to respond to the Tribunal's warning letter of 28 January 2026 giving them an opportunity to explain or request a hearing.

Key Issues

  • Claim not actively pursued

Decision Text

Full PDF

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Marie Walpole Respondent: The Abbey School (Faversham) JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 28 January 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that • the claim had not been actively pursued; and/or 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Andrews 21 April 2026

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.