Decision date
5 July 2023
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge H Grewal
Case Summary
The Tribunal found that the Claimant’s application to change his terms and conditions from working at the Respondent’s office in London to working from home in Luxembourg was not an application under section 80F(1)(iii) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Why this outcome?
Jurisdictional barThe tribunal found that the claimant's application to change working location from London to Luxembourg did not fall within the statutory framework for flexible working requests under section 80F(1)(iii) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and therefore the claim had no legal foundation.
Related claim guides
Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.
Key Issues
- •Whether the Claimant made an application under section 80F of the Employment Rights Act 1996; If he did, whether the Respondent failed to comply with section 80G(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 in dealing with his application.
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page. Tribunal Intel does not republish the raw judgment text inline.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Case No.
- 2207602/2022
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 5 July 2023
- Published
- 21 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge H Grewal