Back to search
1801250/2025Struck Out

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

7 October 2025England & WalesEmployment Judge Maidment
GOV.UK

Case Summary

The claimant's complaints of direct disability discrimination and discrimination arising from disability were dismissed upon withdrawal. The complaint of unfair dismissal was struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success.

Key Issues

  • no_reasonable_prospect_of_success
  • inherent_improbability

Claim Types

Cited Laws and Legal Issues

Employment Rights Act 1996 unfair dismissalEmployment Rights Act 1996

bility were dismissed upon withdrawal. The complaint of unfair dismissal was struck out as having no reasonable prospect of succ

Equality Act 2010 disability discriminationEquality Act 2010

The claimant's complaints of direct disability discrimination and discrimination arising from disability were dismiss

Decision Text

Case No: 1801250/2025 10.2 Judgment - rule 61 March 2017 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr A Abuelmagd Respondent: Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Heard at: Leeds On: 4 September 2025 Before: Employment Judge Maidment Representation Claimant: Mr Singh, Pupil Barrister Respondent: Mr A Sugarman, Counsel RESERVED JUDGMENT 1. The claimant’s complaints of direct disability discrimination and discrimination arising from disability in respect of his exclusion from work under MHPS on 4 March 2025 are dismissed upon the claimant’s withdrawal of them. 2. The claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal is struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. 3. The claimant’s complaints of discrimination arising from disability, a failure to make reasonable adjustments and indirect disability discrimination are struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. REASONS 1. A complaint may be struck out if it has no reasonable prospect of success. The tribunal is given this power by Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. A complaint of discrimination should only be struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success in the most obvious and plainest of cases, it being recognised that discrimination cases are generally Case No: 1801250/2025 10.2 Judgment - rule 61 March 2017 fact sensitive - Anayanwu v South Bank Students’ Union and South Bank University [2001] IRLR 305. The claimant’s case must be taken at its highest. Nevertheless, a tribunal is entitled to strike out claims which are so inherently improbable that they can be regarded as “fanciful” and “baseless” – Ahir v British Airways Plc [2017] EWCA Civ 1392. In that ...

Download full PDF

Employer

Respondent

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

Employer page →View all cases →

Employment Details

Industry
Healthcare
Representation
Legally represented

Case Details

Case Number
1801250/2025
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Level
First instance
Decision Date
07/10/2025
Published
14/10/2025
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Maidment