M&E Pro Ltd (In Compulsory Liquidation)

Case Summary

The claims brought by Mr T Brown and Mr I Brown against M&E Pro Limited (In Compulsory Liquidation) were struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The tribunal had written to the claimants on 05 March 2026 warning that the claim had not been actively pursued and giving them an opportunity to respond, but they failed to reply.

The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The tribunal gave the claimants a formal warning letter on 05 March 2026 under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, inviting them to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing, but the claimants did not respond.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •Whether claim should be struck out for failure to actively pursue

1601697/2025 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr T Brown Mr I Brown Respondent: M&E Pro Limited (In Compulsory Liquidation) JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the Claimants on 05 March 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that • the claim had not been actively pursued 2. The letter gave the Claimants an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The Claimants have not replied. 3. I am satisfied that the grounds for striking out the claims under Rule 38 apply, and that it would be in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 3 to strike out the claim. 4. The claim is therefore struck out. Approved by: Employment Judge Jenkins Dated: 31.03.2026 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 02 April 2026 Kacey O’Brien FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE