Decision date
10 March 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Cadney
Case Summary
The claimant brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against SR Motor Group. The tribunal struck out the complaint because the claimant had less than two years' service, which is a statutory requirement under Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Why this outcome?
No qualifying employment periodThe claim was struck out because the claimant was employed for less than two years, which falls short of the statutory minimum service requirement of two years under Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, meaning the claimant was not entitled to bring such a complaint.
Claim Types
Related claim guides
Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.
Key Issues
- •whether claimant had two years' service required for unfair dismissal claim under Section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Case No.
- 1402621/2025
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 10 March 2026
- Published
- 21 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney