1402621/2025Struck out

SR Motor Group

10 March 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Cadney

Respondent

SR Motor Group

All cases →

Decision date

10 March 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Cadney

Case Summary

The claimant brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against SR Motor Group. The tribunal struck out the complaint because the claimant had less than two years' service, which is a statutory requirement under Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Why this outcome?

No qualifying employment period

The claim was struck out because the claimant was employed for less than two years, which falls short of the statutory minimum service requirement of two years under Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, meaning the claimant was not entitled to bring such a complaint.

Claim Types

Related claim guides

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

Key Issues

  • whether claimant had two years' service required for unfair dismissal claim under Section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996

Original published judgment

The full source document is available from the official publication page.

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.