1304267/2024Claimant won

Telent Technology Services Ltd

v Mr Grey

17 March 2025·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge K Wright

Respondent

Telent Technology Services Ltd

All cases →

Decision date

17 March 2025

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge K Wright

Compensation awarded

£5,127

Compensatory

£5,127

Extracted from judgment text — may not capture every award component precisely.

Case Summary

The claimant, Mr Grey, was unfairly dismissed according to the tribunal. The respondent, Telent Technology Services Limited, was ordered to pay a compensatory award of £5,126.57.

Why this outcome?

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by the respondent, and therefore ordered the respondent to pay compensatory damages to the claimant.

Claim Types

Related guide

Unfair dismissal cases won in the UK

Compare this judgment with other successful unfair dismissal cases and controlled win reasons.

Open examples

Decision Text

Full PDF

1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant:Mr Grey Respondent:Telent Technology Services Limited Heard at:Birmingham (by CVP) On:27 & 28 February 2025 Before:Employment Judge K Wright REPRESENTATION: Claimant:Mr F Grey (Mr Grey's father) Respondent: Ms Darlow Stearn (Counsel) JUDGMENT The judgment of the Tribunal is as follows: Unfair Dismissal 1.The complaint of unfair dismissal is well-founded. The claimant was unfairly dismissed. 2.There is a 60 % chance that the claimant would have been fairly dismissed in any event. The respondent shall pay the claimant the following sums:. (a) A compensatory award of£5,126.57. Notethat these are the actual sums payable to the claimant after any deductions or uplifts have been applied. 3.The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 apply: a. The total monetary award (i.e. the compensatory award) payable to the claimant for unfair dismissal is£5,126.57 2 b. The prescribed element is£4,926.57. c. The period of the prescribed element is from 16 February 2024 to 27 February 2025. d. The difference between (a) and (b) is£200 Employment Judge K Wright 17 th March 2025 Note Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. Written reasons will not be provided unless a party asked for them at the hearing or a party makes a written request within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments (apart from judgments under rule 52) and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case.

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.