1303045/2025Struck out

Genting Casinos UK Ltd

v Miss T Chowdry and Others

5 May 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Flood

Respondent

Genting Casinos UK Ltd

All cases →

Decision date

5 May 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Flood

Case Summary

Three claimants brought claims against Genting Casinos UK Limited. The tribunal struck out all claims under rule 38(1)(a) and (c) of the ET Rules on the basis that the claims have no reasonable prospects of success and the claimants have not complied with the ET Rules or a Tribunal order. The tribunal found that the claimants could not rely on the exemption under the EC Rules because their claims do not arise out of the same dispute and do not give rise to common or related issues of fact or law.

Why this outcome?

No reasonable prospects

The claims were struck out because they have no reasonable prospects of success and the claimants failed to comply with the ET Rules or a Tribunal order. Additionally, the tribunal found that the claimants could not rely on the exemption under the EC Rules as their claims do not arise out of the same dispute and do not give rise to common or related issues of fact or law, making it unreasonable for them to be made on the same claim form.

Related claim guides

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

Key Issues

  • Whether claims arise out of the same dispute
  • Whether claims give rise to common or related issues of fact or law
  • Whether it was reasonable for claims to be made on the same claim form
  • Reasonable prospects of success
  • Compliance with ET Rules or Tribunal order

Decision Text

Full PDF

Case Nos: 1303045/2025, 1303046/2025 and 1303047/2025 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimants: Miss T Chowdry Miss C Blick Mr M J McGowran Respondent: Genting Casinos UK Limited Heard at: Birmingham by CVP video hearing On: 5 May 2026 Before: Employment Judge Flood Representation Claimants: Did not attend Respondent: Ms Wells (Solicitor) JUDGMENT 1. The claims listed above are struck out rule 38(1) (a) and (c) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024 (‘ET Rules’) because: (a) the claims have no reasonable prospects of success; and (b) the claimants have not complied with the ET Rules or a Tribunal order. None of the claimants listed above can rely on the exemption under the Employment Tribunals (Early Conciliation: Exemptions and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2014 (the ‘EC Rules’) because their claims do not arise out of the ‘same dispute’. Their claims do not give rise to common or related issues of fact or law and it was not otherwise reasonable for their claims to be made on the same claim form under rule 11 of the ET Rules. Therefore the claims are struck out. Employment Judge Flood Approved on 05 May 2026 Case Nos: 1303045/2025, 1303046/2025 and 1303047/2025 2 Note Notes: Reasons for the judgment having been given in full orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment- tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case. Recording and Transcription Please note that if a Tribunal hearing has been recorded you

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.