Latest tribunal judgments.

Mr G Bickerstaff v Caledonian Macbrayne Crewing (Guernsey) Ltd and Others: 4102596/2025

The claimant, who had fibromyalgia and coronary heart disease, claimed disability discrimination under Section 15 of the Equality Act 2010, alleging the respondent prevented him from applying for early ill health retirement as an active pension scheme member by imposing a 'never work again' requirement not found in the pension scheme rules. The tribunal dismissed the claim after a four-day merits hearing.

P Macdonald v Computershare Technology Services (UK) Ltd: 8001730/2025

The claimant, an IT Incident Manager, brought complaints of direct associative disability discrimination, indirect sex discrimination, and indirect disability discrimination following the respondent's refusal of his flexible working request on 10 March 2025. The tribunal heard evidence regarding the claimant's care responsibilities for disabled twins and the respondent's business reasons for requiring office attendance. All three complaints were dismissed as not well founded.

Mr T McLaughlin v Renfrew Transport Services Ltd: 8002540/2025

The claimant brought claims for arrears of wages, unpaid holiday pay, breach of contract (notice pay), and failure to make a statutory redundancy payment against his former employer. The tribunal dismissed all claims as they were presented outside the applicable statutory time limits. While the tribunal found it was not reasonably practicable to commence some complaints within the normal time limit, those complaints were not brought within a reasonable further period, and the redundancy claim could have been brought within the normal time limit.

Mr P Handzel v McCurrach UK Ltd and Mr S O’Brien: 4106832/2024

The claimant, employed as a Regional Partnership Manager in field marketing, resigned in July 2024 and claimed constructive dismissal, working time detriment, protected disclosure detriment, and unlawful wage deductions. The tribunal dismissed all claims, finding no repudiatory breach of contract, no unlawful detriment, and no unauthorized wage deductions.

Mr D Allison v William Hill Organization Ltd: 4107720/2024

Mr Allison claimed unfair dismissal (constructive), automatically unfair dismissal under whistleblowing provisions, detriment under section 47C ERA, and direct discrimination on grounds of marriage following his resignation from William Hill Organization Limited. The tribunal held a 7-day hearing and dismissed all four claims, finding the respondent had not breached his contract of employment in any repudiatory way and that the claimant had not made protected disclosures qualifying for protection.

Ms E Phairs v The Secretary of State for the Home Department: 8001755/2025

The claimant, an Executive Officer with multiple disabilities including anxiety disorder, OCD, Tourette's Syndrome, PTSD and long-term effects of chemotherapy, claimed the respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments by not allowing her to work from home at short notice and by not disapplying the hybrid working policy. The tribunal dismissed the claims, finding that the respondent had already made substantial adjustments and that the requested adjustments were not reasonable.

Mrs G McMurdo v Drs McNutt, Gall and Black, T/a Simpson Medical Group: 8000887/2025

The claimant's complaints do not succeed and are dismissed.

Miss S Stirling v Capquest Debt Recovery Ltd: 8002557/2025

Miss Stirling brought claims of unauthorised deductions from wages or alternatively breach of contract relating to a bonus payment against Capquest Debt Recovery Limited. The tribunal dismissed both complaints following a hearing in Glasgow on 6 March 2026.

M Truslove v Simpson Plumbers Ltd: 8002752/2025

The claimant's claim for unfair constructive dismissal fails and is dismissed.

Mr J Fleming v Sodexo Live UK Ltd: 4102603/2025

This claim was brought by a former Finance Manager of a business which supplies catering services at public venues. He was dismissed short of two years' service. He alleges that he was dismissed on the grounds that he made protected disclosures to his line manager. He also alleges detriments by reason of the same disclosures.

Mr R Maddison v Suresave Energy Services UK Ltd: 8001583/2025

The claimant, a Site Manager with kidney cancer, was dismissed on 31 January 2025 on ill health capability grounds after being absent from work since 19 February 2024. The tribunal dismissed all claims including unfair dismissal and disability discrimination, finding the dismissal fair as the respondent had no reasonable prospect of the claimant returning to work and the claimant failed to provide updated medical evidence of fitness to work or a defined return date.

Mr G Miller v T Quality Ltd: 8002638/2025

The Claimant's claim for £562 deducted from his final pay for training costs was dismissed as the Tribunal found the deduction was properly payable under his contract due to a repayment agreement he had signed.

Ms D Macdonald v Highland Health Board: 8000591/2025

The claimant, a registered nurse employed by the respondent NHS Scotland board, alleged that the respondent subjected her to various detriments for the sole or main purpose of preventing or deterring her from taking part in the activities of Unison, the independent trade union of which she was branch secretary, or penalising her for doing so. The employment tribunal found that some of the alleged detriments did not amount to actionable detriments under s.146(1)(b) TULRCA, and that the remaining claims were time-barred.

Mr R R Sinclair v James Johnston & Co. of Elgin Ltd: 4107417/2024

The claim for unfair dismissal not being well founded is dismissed.

Ms L Daisley v Branchton Community Centre Association: 4102859/2019

The tribunal decided to dismiss the claim of unfair dismissal and to dismiss the claim in respect of the payment of notice.

Mr D Toshack v GEO Amey Ltd: 8001392/2025

The claimant brought a claim for discrimination and harassment on the grounds of his 'sex-realist' or 'gender-critical' beliefs. The tribunal found that the claimant's beliefs were protected under the Equality Act 2010, but that he was not discriminated against or harassed, and his claim was dismissed.

M A Salas Garcia v Amiable People Ltd T/a Blossom Home Care: 8001796/2025

The claimant brought claims for discrimination on religious grounds, unlawful deduction of wages, and failure to provide written particulars of employment. The tribunal dismissed all of the claimant's claims.

Mr J Melvin v Horizon Parking Ltd: 8001875/2025

The claimant was employed as a mobile patrol officer. He claimed disability discrimination relating to a requirement to undertake electrical work despite being colour blind. The tribunal found that the claimant was not a disabled person under the Equality Act 2010.

Mr A Patrick v Secretary of State for Business and Trade: 8002469/2025

The claim is dismissed.

Mrs L McWilliam v Stranraer Skills Station Ltd: 8002189/2025

The claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal and breach of contract do not succeed.

S Nelson v Lloyds Banking Group plc: 8001650/2024

The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy during her maternity leave. She brought claims of unfair dismissal and maternity discrimination.

Ms K Anderson v East Dunbartonshire Council: 8002033/2024

The claimant was employed as a Policy Adviser and alleged she was unfairly dismissed, automatically unfairly dismissed for making a protected disclosure, and subjected to detriment for making a protected disclosure. The tribunal dismissed all of the claimant's complaints.

Mr H Aberdeen v Scotch Whiskey Auctions Ltd: 8001912/2024

The claimant was not unfairly dismissed. The complaints of unlawful harassment and direct discrimination are ill founded. The claim is dismissed.

Mr S Hontarenko v Plastic Technology Services Ltd: 4100447/2025

The claimant, Mr S Hontarenko, was employed by the respondent, Plastic Technology Services Ltd, as a process operator. He was dismissed for gross misconduct and brought a claim of unfair dismissal. The tribunal found that the dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses and dismissed the claim.

Mr M Sfeir v Margiotta Ltd and D Broadbent: 8002112/2024

The claimant's complaints of Automatic Unfair Dismissal under s103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and detriments under s47B of the Act fail and are dismissed.

Mr S Muir v Tapi Carpets and Floors Ltd: 4103389/2025

The claimant was not constructively dismissed by the respondent. The respondent did not make any unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages and did not breach the claimant's contract of employment. His claim is dismissed.

Mr Lyle v Calmac Ferries Ltd: 8002368/2025

The claimant's unfair dismissal claim is dismissed as he does not have the required continuous service.

Mr A Chandio v Grampian Health Board: 8001246/2024

Mr Chandio's claim for unfair dismissal, breach of contract, and discrimination on the grounds of race and religion was dismissed. The tribunal found no evidence that his treatment was motivated by his race or religion.

Ms L Maynard v M Group Services Ltd: 8001755/2024

The claimant brought claims of equal pay, direct discrimination on the grounds of sex and race, harassment on the grounds of race, and victimisation, all of which were dismissed.

Mrs J Mitchell v Aberdeenshire Council: 4101062/2025

The claimant brought claims of constructive unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, disability-related harassment, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and unauthorised deduction from wages against her former employer, Aberdeenshire Council. The Employment Tribunal dismissed all of the claims.

Mr M Peat v Valley Group Ltd: 8001603/2025

The claimant brought claims of automatic unfair dismissal, unlawful deductions from wages, and breach of contract against his former employer, the respondent company. The tribunal dismissed all of the claimant's claims.

Mrs S Whyte v AGI Global Logistics (GLA) Ltd: 8001651/2025

The key issues were whether there was a relevant transfer under TUPE from the respondent to another entity on 1 November 2024, and the effect this has on the claimant's equal pay claim.

Mr P Sarkar v Advice Direct Scotland Ltd: 4100709/2025

The claimant was employed by the respondent charity and alleged he was subjected to detriments and automatically unfairly dismissed for making protected disclosures. This preliminary hearing determined that the claimant did not make any protected disclosures, so the claim was dismissed.

Ms L Anderson v Fueltone Ltd (In Liquidation): 8001235/2025

The claimant, a single parent, was made redundant when the small fuel additive company she worked for went into compulsory liquidation. The tribunal dismissed her claim for redundancy pay, finding that the company's liquidation meant the claimant was not entitled to a redundancy payment under the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Mr P Smith v STV Television Ltd and Others: 4102832/2025

The claimant brought complaints against the respondents in relation to automatic unfair dismissal, detriment for making protected disclosures, and disability discrimination. The claimant made various case management applications, including for the judge to recuse himself, strike-out of the response, and a judgment to be issued under Rule 22. The tribunal refused all of the claimant's applications.

Ms M Mackinnon v Voneus Broadband Ltd: 8001155/2025

The claimant was dismissed on grounds of redundancy. The Tribunal found the dismissal was fair and reasonable in the circumstances.

Mr A Weir v Thomas Cuthell & Sons Ltd: 4103072/2025

The claimant's claim of unfair dismissal fails and is dismissed.

Mr D McCue v Coldside Medical Practice: 8002160/2024

The claimant, Mr D McCue, brought claims of constructive unfair dismissal and detriment for making protected disclosures against his former employer, Coldside Medical Practice. The tribunal dismissed both claims, finding that the claimant's reasons for resignation were not supported by the evidence and that he had not made any protected disclosures.

Ms A L McVey v Sky UK Ltd: 8000875/2025

The claimant brought complaints of unfair dismissal, direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, failure to comply with the duty to make reasonable adjustments, indirect disability discrimination, harassment related to disability and victimisation, which were resisted by the respondent.

Mr J Allan v Department for Work and Pensions: 4107785/2024

The claims for disability discrimination in relation to the failure to provide reasonable adjustments, including a suitable chair and monitor arm, and to adjust the claimant's work schedule and provide microbreaks, were dismissed.